I can understand peoples irritation regarding the period dramas currently being shown on Yesterday. I think the problem is that the programmers don't understand the difference between thinly disguised period melodramas, depicting well researched cultural and social history and historical drama. Catherine Cookson's stories usually has the same patronizing tale, where unimaginative working class people shout at each other apart from the ambitious 'own worst enemy' heroine who's redeemed by an 'outsider' middle class man. Pure melodramatic fiction, commonly called 'bodice rippers'. Historical dramas are usually well researched biographies, i.e. 'Shoulder To Shoulder' the brilliant 1970s series about the Suffragettes or the recent BBC4 Anne Frank dramas.
Over the years there have been a number of award winning dramatic series which is often the only way women in history, or minority groups, have had their stories portrayed on TV. 'The House Of Elliot', which I love, crosses both genres, but while not to everyone's taste, is a valid and educative introduction to the interwar years cultural, economic and political history.
What I dislike so much about the inclusion of Catherine Cookson, is the programmers patronizing attitude to placate women, calling Sunday afternoons the 'Passionate Period' or something similar in it's TV ads. All people watching UKTV History/Yesterday want quality fact based history, in all it's depictions, if we want to watch period melodrama, we'll watch IVT3. To presume women need light relief after 'getting the sunday roast on the table' is insulting.
I suspect Yesterday's programmers need to learn more about the difference between historical drama and period melodramas than the channels viewers. The way they are going at the moment, I wouldn't be surprised to see 'The Adventurers of Sherlock Holmes' appearing in a Victorian theme, and the 'X Files' as contemporary history. All Yesterday'll do is lose viewers as other factual channels emerge if they don't get it right.
