Message Boards
Please use this form if you have a serious complaint about this message, that is, if it is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, harmful, profane, racially offensive or otherwise stronly objectionable. (Please see message board rules for more details.)

If you don't wish to carry on, you can return to the boards

Fill in the form below to complain about this post (please note you must complain about each message individually).
gastrosurf

Posted 9.47AM
Fri 9 May 2008

Something I always question is the justification used by program makers that says they just provide the viewing public with what they want. I think there is a great deal more dissatisfaction with TV programs on all channels than viewing figures will ever reveal. Plus, I think the sheer volume of programs and the high level of exposure (possibly having an addictive element) tends to shape viewer's expectations and preferences. Of all the TV that I watch, I would only bother to set the Sky box to record about 10% of it if there was a chance of missing it. Missing the other 90% wouldn't really bother me, however, if I am at home I will probably watch it.


To really understand the celebrity culture I think you have to look wider than the TV screen and at the economic and political context that such reverence has developed in. Also, in Britain over the past ten years, we have imported a great deal of rubbish from America - in terms of TV programs, lifestyle trends, and political ideas.

 
 

 

Why do you think this message breaks our rules? (you must fill this in)

 
Sky Channel 259, Virgin TV 260
UKTV Food On TV Now

UKTV Food  All UKTV