Comments Made

View All

• On QI:

  Posted on 9th of June 2009

  Ps. I have just read Bumflufs comment and realized you were referring to him about the whole I.Q thing, which adds two more points, one being; On your next comment, watch your grammar and two; my point still stands about your intellect being insulted, whether it was by me or some one else. Pps. Not all I.Q tests are taken online, you can take official ones set by your government, true they're not accurate, but they're the closest thing to it, figure out a new way to test I.Q if you want, you could get rich from such a discovery, or... you could always calm your fingers and leave this game for the big boys to handle... Now who's being undermining. (Thought I'd add that in for Bumfluf)

• On QI:

  Posted on 9th of June 2009

  You really should read what people type before you decide to "bash" but I'll humor you. Firstly; I didn't write that I used Wikipedia, in my opinion Wikipedia is flawed, because it gets its information from the public and not from trusted sources. Secondly; I gave facts and proof into my claim, thus why I gave a link in my comment, you on the other hand would rather show how childish you are by trying to undermine someone over the internet for merely giving some insight into a topic and not having any proof to back up your claims that I may be wrong. Thirdly; I never mentioned anything about I.Q tests, I just think you saw my post as an insult to your own intellect, because in some small childish way, you're somehow jealous of a random person on a random website that just happens to know more than you. And to be honest, that's pretty sad... Grow up.

• On QI:

  Posted on 20th of February 2009

  So my last comment didn't seem "bleak" to some, I'll end on a Proverb by - Zhuge Liang. "Those who are skilled in combat do not become angered, those who are skilled at winning do not become afraid. Thus the wise win before they fight, while the ignorant fight to win."