Simon Amstell vs Mark Lamarr

Simon Amstell vs Mark Lamarr

It’s a battle royal between the 50s throwback and the curly-haired upstart, but which of them has been the best presenter of Never Mind The Buzzcocks – Mark Lamarr or Simon Amstell? We pit the presenters against each other. You decide.

Mark Lamarr

The case for Mark Lamarr

Mark Lamarr was there from the very start when Never Mind the Buzzcock's first hit our screens in 1996 (yes it was that long ago), and his lacquered quiff, sardonic wit and love of obscure reggae stood out a mile in the days of baggy Britpop. If only for his long-standing loyalty (nine long years of undeniable loyalty) Mark’s surely already well in the lead in the race for best presenter - how could anyone even argue that a Johnny-come lately like Amstell is in contention?

Mark’s razor-sharp wit invented Amstell, gone were the days of taking boy bands seriously, of treating pop poppets as equals, or heaven forbid stars, of even treating z-list celebs like they actually mattered. Not only could he make your average pop star feel the size of Jimmy Crankie’s boxers, but he also genuinely loved music and was a bona fide encyclopaedia of anyone worth knowing about. Any host awarding points for being Jimmy Cliff is alright by us.

He made 150 episodes over 17 series before declaring it was time for a break (a very long break as he didn't actually come back), never lost his cool or his funnies and fought the good fights against egos, bubblegum nonsense and Chris Moyles above and beyond the call of duty. Sure Amstell’s witty but he’s a pup compared to Lamarr’s top dog status - quiffed, well-heeled and not a man to trifle with - there’s only one man worthy of the Buzzcocks chair and it’s Mark Lamarr. Nuff said.

Simon Amstell

The Case for Simon Amstell

When Mark bowed out we’d have been forgiven for thinking Buzzcocks’ best days were over, and at best it would continue like The Doors’ world tour minus Jim Morrison, or something. Luckily curly-haired Simon Amstell had graduated from T4’s Popworld just in time to fill Mark’s great big chair, and having appeared as both a guest (during Lamarr's tenure) and guest host (when Lamarr took a break), was more than a little prepared for all the banter, barking and absolute madness when he took the reigns permanently.

Pop music is a young man’s game - Mark may have done his time but it was the equivalent of the creepy uncle still dressed as a Teddy Boy at a wedding by the end of his run. You don’t see pop stars looking cool past their 20s so it’s only right this cutting edge music show have a similarly trendy presenter - most of the guests were in nappies when Mark was going to his first gigs. And it’s not like Amstell is some Skins-lite style-over-substance merchant, he’s got just as many quips and is just as sharp a wit as Lamarr, in fact if we didn’t know better we’d swear he was his unholy baby boy (in some weird parallel universe, obviously).

Sure he didn’t last as long as Mark leaving after three years, but can anyone really say The Sex Pistols were less important than U2 just because they were gone in a flash? Only a serial pleb, and probably a serial pleb in wraparound sunglasses and a hat at that. Simon was the face of wit for the mp3 generation, bringing the show bang up to date, reminding us not all young people are hooded stab-fans and showing that sometimes put downs hurt the most when delivered by a man in a fashion tie.

Add a comment

Comments

Displaying 1 to 5 of 22

  • RussellB41659 RussellB41659 | 10 Sep 11

    Mark Lamarr 'made'Buzzcocks his little monolouges that started " I always liked ' 'when I say liked ,I mean tolerated,when I say tolerated I mean . . .His banter with Phil jupitus and the Great Bill Bailey was always hilarious.the show was still funny for awhile when Mark and Bill left but it dropped consideraly since thier absence still ther's Q.I MOCK THE WEEK and HAVE I GOT NEWS at least that hasn't been spoilt . . . YET

  • MaryE24823 MaryE24823 | 1 Jun 11

    SIMON AMSTELL. Mark Lamarr was pretentious.

  • shelleyK70199 shelleyK70199 | 16 Apr 11

    lamarr! i loved old buzzcocks, with Mark Lamarr nd Sean Hughes... so xxxxxx annoyed that its never on. hopefully dave will re-repeat it sometime...

  • AdrianG56590 AdrianG56590 | 30 Sep 10

    Amstell- he basically had perfect wit

  • Damn Good For 60 Damn Good For 60 | 6 May 10

    No way should Mark lammar step back into the shoes of Buzzcocks. Simon Amstell does a far superior job and a more entertaining way opf doing so. KEEP LAMMAR OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Displaying 6 to 11 of 22

  • JackH24816 JackH24816 | 13 Feb 10

    By far Lamarr, fantastic comedian Amstill is decent but he can't hold a candle to Mark

  • tv_hoax tv_hoax | 6 Feb 10

    got to be Lamarr with his sharp humour, beret shaped hair and singing of house of the rising sun. i miss him - amstell will never compare. the la marr episodes should be released on dvd

  • JamesH2203 JamesH2203 | 11 Dec 09

    Mark Lamarr is better. They're both irratating at times but Amstell really gets on your nerves !

  • the-young-ones the-young-ones | 6 Dec 09

    i love mark lamarr! i absolutely adore him! i find simon annoying if im honest. i was once watching mark on buzzcocks but my dad said i had to go to bed (yes im a 15 yr old female who spends her life watching Dave) i got so upset that i couldnt carry on watching it that when i woke up the next day i had conjunctivitis in both eyes. had to miss school. that was odd....... :S

  • DeanR77855 DeanR77855 | 19 Nov 09

    Liked Mark back in the day, Simon was better when he came along. Same kind of humour and wit but in a less hostile way :-P Dunno who they're gonna get to fill the seat now, the one off stand ins are lame...

Displaying 11 to 16 of 22

  • Sarah&Colin Sarah&Colin | 21 Oct 09

    Simon is a curly haired little aarrgh, so irritating. Go Mark Lamarr - all the way!

  • ADAMG76537 ADAMG76537 | 19 Oct 09

    Simon!!!

  • Rex7939 Rex7939 | 13 Oct 09

    DEFINATELY Simon. The new series isn't as good now he's gone. :'(

  • Sarah&Colin Sarah&Colin | 13 Oct 09

    Mark Lamarr is king of Buzzcocks!

  • RobC97410 RobC97410 | 13 Oct 09

    Amstell is better

Displaying 16 to 21 of 22

  • Josie-BearM54041 Josie-BearM54041 | 12 Oct 09

    Lamarr is God of the Buzzcocks lol. Amstell isnt too bad but Lamarr has that gritty, comical just... thing about him. He could literally say anything and noone would complain.

  • Albie175 Albie175 | 12 Oct 09

    Simon Amstell is genius! Lamarr was great too, but I seem to find the show unmissable now, rather than simply a diversion from the usual guff.

  • King Gibbon King Gibbon | 12 Oct 09

    Lamarr all the way! Simon is... ok but doesn't bring the charisma that Mark had

  • JamesKirk JamesKirk | 11 Oct 09

    Lamarr. Amstel's a genuinely funny guy, but Lamarr had the music knowledge to back up his sarcasm, and ad-lib better.

  • JackieR46375 JackieR46375 | 11 Oct 09

    Definitely Mark Lamarr. Don't know why he was ever taken off. He just wasn't there any more. Did I miss something. He was funny. This new twit is just annoying and extremely rude. Bring back Mark Lamarr.

Displaying 21 to 22 of 22

  • AliT61151 AliT61151 | 11 Oct 09

    I LOVE AMSTELL!

  • Babysham80 Babysham80 | 11 Oct 09

    Lamarr - hes a classic and made the show - Amstel tried but he'll never reach the sarcastic levels of Mark

Biggest Car Casualties

Biggest Car Casualties

We know it was a bad year for car sales last year, the market dropping 15.5 percent, but what about the individual victims? The models with an annus so horribilis it makes the others feel a little better?

Ed Byrne

Ed Byrne

Batteries Not Included guest Ed Byrne reveals his gadget-related secrets.